WARNING: This blog contains copious amounts of adult GAY material. If that's offensive to you, please leave now. All pix have been gleaned from the internets so, if you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.I REPEAT: If you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.
There are a lot of the first two designs around our neighborhood. Lovely homes, and sadly neglected. They could be real showcase stunners if the owners actually knew what they had.
ReplyDeleteAh, the early 1900s, when a house, no matter how small, had to have a big dining room, bigger than the kitchen. House #1 is a prime example. The dining room is far larger than either the tiny kitchen or the tiny bedroom. House #1 is also bizarre because it has a second chimney at the side of the house (which goes through the pantry in the floor plan) that is presumably the flue for the furnace in the basement, but there is no staircase to access the basement, so there is no basement. A totally incompetent design. The other houses also have a flue for a basement furnace (in house # 3 it's at the side of the main fireplace), but at least they have stairs to get to the basement.
ReplyDeleteLarry - Perhaps plan No.1 has an outside access to the basement with bulkhead doors.
ReplyDeleteDe telles maisons de charme, très pratique et économique. Et de styles variés, du Craftsman aux débuts de l’Art Déco. Nous avons au Canada de nombreux bungalows et maisons de ce type, adeptés pour résister à notre climat rigoureux.
ReplyDeleteMonsieur Dupuis 🇨🇦
I could live at # 8304.
ReplyDelete