WARNING: This blog contains copious amounts of adult GAY material. If that's offensive to you, please leave now. All pix have been gleaned from the internets so, if you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.

I REPEAT: If you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.

Monday, September 30, 2024

2024.0930.0005...






7 comments:

  1. #1 is unique. I'm with Le Belge, though...#2 is all that. Big Dude

    ReplyDelete
  2. Love the Picasso-ish #1. But the last photo is great!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know that during the classical periods of art that it was considered vulgar to represent the male genitalia as anatomically correct in size, but from the initials on #2, this looks like a more recent drawing in the classical style. But c'mon, that little peanut of a penis? I've had pimples bigger than that!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Scott from Massachusetts said.

    All very nice!! Especially 2,3, and 4

    Hey, I've seen it all "peanut of a penis" to "elephant's trunk", penises!! On the trials, someone (including me) might have a preference, but we would NEVER shame anyone. ALL ARE WELCOME.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The size seems smaller because neither dick nor ball would show all that well in the position that the model is in. The artist added them in later, and doesn't improvise well, apparently. Any dick is good dick IMO.

    Google Lens shows that the artist for #1 is Richard Taddei. I (apparently) love this artist! It's like a colorful Braque or an accurate Picasso.

    ReplyDelete

Nice you must be or delete your ass I will.