WARNING: This blog contains copious amounts of adult GAY material. If that's offensive to you, please leave now. All pix have been gleaned from the internets so, if you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.I REPEAT: If you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.
2022.0908-Insert-001...
Click on headline to read what religious pukes are doing now...
HIV drug mandate 'violates religious freedoms'
US healthcare plans that cover the main HIV prevention drug free of charge are in violation of the right to religious freedom, a judge has ruled.
Employers are required to cover certain preventive services and medications in their insurance plans under US law.
But a group of Texas Christians sued in 2020 over coverage of the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP, drug.
They argued the drug can "facilitate or encourage homosexual behaviour".
We know they are off base. PreP can also cause straight sex, in-between sex, and the list goes on.
ReplyDeleteThey may not know but there are other things that cause homosexuality.
VRCooper - They really make me sick.
ReplyDeleteLiterally
DeleteBeto needs to win in November. He could take a good step toward ending this kind of bullshit.
ReplyDeleteBetween TX and FLA, they've turned this backwards about 100 years. Sadly, other states do their best to mimic them.
I wouldn't trust anyone who advocated private sector insurance, since this kind of bullshit is inevitable in such a system
DeleteWhkattk, I don't know if you are in Texas now but I'd be very surprised if Beto even comes close. Yesterday, on my drive from Tyler to San Antonio my sister, pro-choice, said she was voting Republican because she feels safer knowing that people have guns to protect themselves.
DeletePat - I hope he wins, too. We could use a couple dozen of his kind.
ReplyDeleteAnd so because of another person's beliefs, other employees have to be deprived of a health service. The judge is nuts as well as the people who brought the case. What would you bet that some of those who brought up the case are not employees or directly affected? Hummm....time to file for another hearing? The whole thing stinks of favoritism and illogical thinking.
ReplyDeleteWhat???? And a judge bought that argument? Was anyone forcing them to take the drug? I don't get what stake they have in this ballgame.
ReplyDeleteTaurus - I see it as one more chip toward xtianism.
ReplyDeleteLeftField - That's awful!
ReplyDeleteI know right. That's Texas!
Delete