Post-15451...

Justice Kennedy Retires. That Means One Thing.

by Ari Ezra Waldman
June 27, 2018 | 6:49pm

_______

I have a lot of feelings about Justice Kennedy’s retirement.

I’m angry. Angry at Republicans who stole a seat away from President Obama. Angry at those who said there was no difference between Hillary and Donald Trump. Angry at those Democrats who sat out the 2010, 2014, and 2016 elections. Angry at those caught up in a false media narrative about emails. Angry that we could have stopped this had we been smarter.

I’m worried. Worried for our country. Worried that I’m not doing enough to solve the problem. Worried that real people–mostly persons of color, sexual minorities, and women–are getting hurt while the junta running our country props up the white patriarchy and lines the pockets of wealthy corporations.

I’m in despair. Justice Kennedy’s replacement could create a solid conservative majority for generations, undermining a woman’s right to choose, anti-discrimination laws, and every protection the queer community has fought for and won over the last three decades. Kennedy was no liberal; his entire career, not just his last few opinions siding with the Court’s other conservatives on unions, abortion clinics, and the Muslim ban, prove he is a conservative through and through. That he was considered a “swing justice” says far more about the conservative center of gravity on the Court than it does Kennedy. But he did author the so-called “gay rights” decisions of Romer, Lawrence, Windsor, and Obergefell. If his replacement looks anything like Justice Gorsuch, all of those decisions are in jeopardy.

Kennedy’s career, his opinions affecting queer communities, his decision to retire, and the politics surrounding it deserve separate columns, and they are all coming soon. But his retirement means one thing right now:

It’s time for progressives to make the federal courts a galvanizing campaign issue!

This had been difficult in the past for a few reasons.

First, law is sometimes inaccessible to your average voter, and the progressive movement utterly lacks a counterweight to the powerful Federalist Society, a conservative organization that both cultivates young conservative legal scholars and works to engage conservative voters on behalf of right-wing legal interpretation. The American Constitution Society does none of that.

Second, progressives have long lived in a legal environment that seems to tilt in their favor. After all, abortion is legal, gays can marry, and we have free speech. It requires progressive to read after the headline to realize that the world is not so rosy. Conservative federal judges have put burdens on a woman’s right to choose; there are several states that are about to be without any abortion providers because of the restrictions states are now allowed to put on those providers. Gays can marry, sure, but they, and their transgender comrades, can be discriminated against left and right. Free speech is awesome, but a libertarian approach to the First Amendment allows those with the biggest megaphone (the richest) to silence the rest of us.

Third, Democratic politicians have shied away from “politicizing” the judiciary. That’s why we’ve gotten solid moderates from Presidents Clinton and Obama. Republicans have long ago abandoned that mantra, which is why they’ve given us radicals and shifted the judiciary far to the right.

All of this has to change, and it has to change now. We need new progressive institutions that make a progressive judiciary the goal. We need political candidates who don’t shrink from making the courts the issue. We need to scare our voters just like conservatives have been doing for years: “Obama is going to take away your guns and overturn the Second Amendment,” “Vote for me and I’ll vote for judges who will overturn Roe v. Wade and end the murder of babies.” Those have been campaign planks for years. There is nothing like that on the left.

So, what can we do? Take the day to despair, and to hug your friends and loved ones. And tomorrow, get to work.

The Democrats have precious little leverage to beat back an arch-conservative nominee. There is no filibuster for Supreme Court nominees. Huge protests like we saw at the beginning of the Trump presidency may persuade Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, but don’t bet on it. Both of those senators like to leverage moderate rhetoric for a while before folding to the conservative leadership in the end. The Democrats could take back the House in November, but Senate Republicans seem far more secure and, in any event, the House plays no role in court nominations.

Therefore, we have to make the Court a campaign issue. It will take generations. It will take engagement by civil society over and above what progressives have been doing to date.

I don’t know about you, but I’ve had enough. I’ve had enough of people telling me progressives don’t understand the courts. If they don’t, then help them. I’ve had enough of people telling me we don’t want to politicize the judiciary any more than it is. If the last dozen 5-4 decisions from this Supreme Court told us anything, it is that the Court is already highly political. Give up the “we go high” nonsense and get in the game.

It’s almost already too late.

Reposted from O!Daddie.

_______

Entire article copied from HERE.

<<<<< >>>>>

Sign my petition: Tell the U.S. Senate that we should not vote on any potential Supreme Court justice until after the American people have had a chance to vote and a new Senate is sworn in next January.

U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders

The Supreme Court is the most important judicial body in the country. The decisions it reaches impact all Americans, even the ones that end up five votes to four.

Since the confirmation of Justice Neil Gorsuch, the court has taken a radical rightward turn. In the past 72 hours alone, it sided with big money interests against working people in an effort to destroy the union movement in this country. And it affirmed the president's Muslim ban and chose fear, racism and xenophobia over the American ideals of religious freedom and tolerance.

Those decisions, both 5-4 votes, were only possible because of the unprecedented actions of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to deny President Obama's nominee a vote ahead of the 2016 elections. He did it because, in his own words, "The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice."

Now that Justice Kennedy will retire at the end of July, Mitch McConnell should remember those words. And our job right now is to make sure he does, and to make it clear the American people want a say in Justice Kennedy's replacement.

Please sign my petition: Tell the U.S. Senate that there should not be a vote on any potential Supreme Court justice until after the American people have had a chance to vote in November and a new Senate is sworn in next January.

The truth is, the American people deserve a Supreme Court justice who respects the rights of workers instead of bowing down to big business. At a time of massive income and wealth inequality in this country, we need a court that will protect workers' rights and not just concern itself with corporate profits.

The American people deserve a Supreme Court that will move us back in the direction of one person, one vote and stop our slide into an oligarchy, in which the political life in this country is increasingly controlled by a handful of billionaire families. I fear that President Trump's next Supreme Court nominee would take the disastrous Citizens United decision even further by supporting the elimination of all restrictions on campaign finance, effectively allowing billionaires to contribute unlimited sums to candidates.

We also cannot risk a Supreme Court that would put in jeopardy the privacy rights of all Americans and a woman's right to control her own body. Reproductive rights in this country are at risk. Despite overwhelming opposition from the American people I believe there is a very strong chance President Trump's next nominee would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. We cannot allow that to happen.

The Supreme Court also recently sided with those who want to make it harder for people to vote. In the year 2018, it should not be too much to ask for people to be able to vote without harassment. Our job should be to make it easier for people to participate in the electoral process, not harder.

Now, the Koch brothers immediately pledged to spend more than seven figures pressuring Democrats into supporting President Trump's nominee.

This time, we must be united from the start that there can be no vote on ANY nominee until the American people have had their chance to make their voices heard.

Add your name if you agree:

Please sign my petition: Tell the U.S. Senate that we should not vote on any potential Supreme Court justice until after the American people have had a chance to vote in November and a new Senate is sworn in next January.

I believe most Americans want a Supreme Court that will stand up for civil liberties, constitutional rights, workers' rights, environmental rights and women's rights.

By now we know that is not what we will get from Donald Trump's nominee. And I believe the American people have a right to make their voices heard about that at the ballot box in November.

In solidarity,

Bernie Sanders

(After signing, they ask for a donation of course, but that's totally up to you.)