WARNING: This blog contains copious amounts of adult GAY material. If that's offensive to you, please leave now. All pix have been gleaned from the internets so, if you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.

I REPEAT: If you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.

Monday, June 04, 2018

Post-15206...

Supreme Court backs Christian baker who spurned gay couple
By Lawrence Hurley

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory on narrow grounds to a Colorado Christian baker who refused for religious reasons to make a wedding cake for a gay couple, stopping short of setting a major precedent allowing people to claim exemptions from anti-discrimination laws based on religious beliefs.

The justices, in a 7-2 decision, said the Colorado Civil Rights Commission showed an impermissible hostility toward religion when it found that baker Jack Phillips violated the state's anti-discrimination law by rebuffing gay couple David Mullins and Charlie Craig in 2012. The state law bars businesses from refusing service based on race, sex, marital status or sexual orientation.

The ruling concluded that the commission violated Phillips' religious rights under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.

But the court did not issue a definitive ruling on the circumstances under which people can seek exemptions from anti-discrimination laws based on their religious views. The decision also did not address several of the claims raised in the case, including whether baking a cake is a kind of expressive act protected by the Constitution's guarantee of free speech.

Two of the court's four liberals, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, joined the five conservative justices in the ruling authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy.

"The commission's hostility was inconsistent with the First Amendment's guarantee that our laws be applied in a manner that is neutral toward religion," Kennedy wrote.

Read the rest of the article HERE.

6 comments:

  1. That would never now happen over here in the UK, there have been instances where it's been tried but thankfully,,overruled !
    x

    ReplyDelete
  2. cheap oakley sunglasses a aaaaa 27661

    ReplyDelete
  3. This ruling will eventually be expanded. I understand the defense counsel made some fallible religious-based arguments. In time, religion will not be a wall to stand behind as a means of discrimination.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have to say and I am sorry if it offends anyone, but sometimes for us on this side of the Atlantic.... the 'Land of The Free' has a great deal to explain exactly what freedom and equality means when being gay in certain states.....?

    We have instances where hotels have tried to ban gay couples booking rooms together, even not baking cakes for mixed marriage weddings....thankfully all being ridiculed and overturned, takes time....but we're getting there!
    I hope you'll take the message in the way it is intended....take care guys...
    Bob x

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cheers Rick....
    Regards always
    Bob

    ReplyDelete

Nice you must be or delete your ass I will.