WARNING: This blog contains copious amounts of adult GAY material. If that's offensive to you, please leave now. All pix have been gleaned from the internets so, if you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.

I REPEAT: If you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.

Sunday, December 29, 2024

2024.1229.0002...

Click on headline for more images and the story...

World’s first ‘upcycled’ skyscraper saves Australian tower from demolition

Once Sydney’s tallest building, the AMP Centre was showing its age. The out­dated 1970s struc­ture had come to the end of its lifespan, and the tower’s owners wanted to replace it with something bigger, better and more energy-efficient. But demolishing high-rises comes with significant environmental costs, from con­struc­tion waste to the CO2 emitted by heavy machin­ery. So in 2014, Australian invest­ment firm AMP Capital launched an architectural competition with an unprecedented brief: To build a new skyscraper without demol­ish­ing the old one.
Dubbed the world’s first “upcycled” high-rise, the resulting tower opened earlier this year and, on Friday, was named World Building of the Year 2022. Standing at 676 feet tall, the vastly expanded 49-story skyscraper, now known as Quay Quarter Tower, retained more than two-thirds of the old struc­ture, including beams and columns, as well as 95% of the original building’s core. “The tower was coming to the end of the end of its life, in terms of viability… but the structure and the ‘bones’ can actually last a lot longer,” said Fred Holt, a partner at the Danish architecture firm behind the design, 3XN, in a video interview. “You can’t always retain everything. But if you can retain the structure — and that’s where the majority of your embodied carbon is — then you’re lowering your footprint.”

6 comments:

  1. You mean it looks like that even without being demolished?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Infidel - The new building was built using the skeleton of the old building.

      Delete
  2. That is amazing....and yet another thing the US could excel at but doesn't. WE are terrible at repurposing buildings or complexes. The answer is always to tear down, let it sit empty, or tear up more land. heavens forbid we leave any green open space or undeveloped land.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not to mention what's not said in the article but is obvious: the cost of this "upscaling" must have been lower than what a demolition added to the construction of a brand new one would have been. That's a win-win for both the realtors and environment. Hats off!
    (and I very much like its new look)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Danish flair and inginuity meets Aussie common sense and innovation.🇩🇰🇦🇺

    ReplyDelete
  5. We, especially in America, live in an age where everything is treated as disposable; product packaging, the products themselves, everything old and past its usefulness, yes, even human life. When it comes to what mankind has built in the past, and Ricky continuously shows us in some of his posts, the extraordinary buildings and mansions of long ago, fall into disrepair for various reasons and are abandoned to the ravages of time. This is certainly one bright spot in this wasteful evolution.

    ReplyDelete

Nice you must be or delete your ass I will.