WARNING: This blog contains copious amounts of adult GAY material. If that's offensive to you, please leave now. All pix have been gleaned from the internets so, if you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.I REPEAT: If you see a picture of yourself that you don't wish to have posted here, please leave a comment on the post and I will remove it with my apologies.
All three go against the US Constitution and are therefore rendered unenforceable. But it's bad enough that those statements are even there. By all intents they should've been denied statehood.
ReplyDeleteMy first reaction was wondering if the "conservatives" in the Republican party are the modern version of "Puritans"? Remember how much nicer society seemed to become when women could enjoy sex . . . and they told their male partners how to do it better? Guess for all of the above, "memos" were not received?
ReplyDeleteThose times also brought to light the "date rape" and similar situations, where the "dominant male" had his way, no matter what, with his wife. Sex is for more than procreation, but should be fun for all involved.
I say that if these states want to secede again, we let them—with ample time given for any sane individuals to emigrate. The rest of the country is better off without them.
ReplyDelete(And don't be surprised if you see that I've reposted all of these.)
Re: Puritans
ReplyDeletePuritan is the front parlor name for religious extremist. In the Anglican church, the monarch is also its head.
The extremist group refused to acknowledge this fact; actually in violation with the New Testament's admonition of obedience to the king for being god's choice and therefore heaven's choice.
The extremists soon made the list for a long drop and a short rope. That's when they scrimped together enough funds to invade Spanish territory and soon inflict themselves on generations of new Americans.
The last three clearly violate the U.S. constitution, and the second one is ridiculous. The first one is more tricky. The basic argument of anti-abortionists is that a human embryo, even when it’s a single cell, is a baby, so abortion is murder.
ReplyDeleteRick Santorum’s statement is consistent with that view; that an embryo that results from rape or incest is a baby, and therefore abortion should never be allowed. People who support anti-abortion laws with exceptions for rape and incest are actually taking the ludicrous and indefensible position that sometimes it’s OK to murder a baby and sometimes it isn’t.
The pro-choice position, of course, is that an embryo is not a baby, so abortion is not murder. Getting rid of the embryo is OK; keeping it is OK; let the woman choose.